Outreach Review · Updated May 2026

Outreach Review 2026: the honest take on sales engagement's enterprise default

Outreach is the most mature sales engagement platform on the market, the safest pick for Salesforce-first enterprise teams, and the most expensive way to send a sequence. After parsing the Amplify restructure, the outreach.ai rebrand, 3,400+ G2 reviews, and 2026 procurement data, here's our honest read for buyers evaluating it.

Verdict

3.7 /5
★★★½☆

Best for

Salesforce shops with 50+ reps running structured outbound

Skip if

You're under 30 reps or on HubSpot CRM

Starting price

~$100-160/user/month

The verdict

What you actually need to know about Outreach in 2026

Outreach is the deepest, most mature sales engagement platform on the market. The sequence engine is the most feature-dense in the category, the Salesforce integration is the gold standard, and Kaia conversation intelligence is built into the same platform instead of bolted on. If you're a 50+ rep Salesforce shop running structured outbound with a dedicated admin, Outreach is the safe enterprise choice. That part of the story is real.

But Outreach in 2026 is a different company than the one that built its reputation. Four rounds of layoffs (the most recent in November 2024), a CEO change (Manny Medina out in September 2024, Abhijit Mitra in), a domain rebrand to outreach.ai, and a tier restructure into Amplify Core, Plus, and Pro have all happened in the last 18 months. Reported per-seat pricing of $100 to $160 per user per month plus $5K-$25K implementation fees means a 50-rep team easily clears $100K year one. We break the numbers down in our full Outreach pricing analysis.

The most telling data point in the category: across hundreds of G2 and Capterra reviews, the single most consistent complaint is the HubSpot integration. Sync failures, broken tag propagation, duplicate activities, opted-out fields that don't sync bidirectionally. If your CRM is HubSpot, this is the buying decision that will define your next two years. If that math gives you pause, take a look at our shortlist of best Outreach alternatives.

Our verdict: 3.7 out of 5. Category-leading product for Salesforce enterprise. A documented headache for almost everyone else.

~$250-300M
Estimated ARR (late 2025)
$4.4B
Last marked valuation (June 2021)
5,500+
Companies on platform
$100K+
Year-one cost for a 50-rep team

Skip the sales call

Ask anything about Outreach without getting on a sales call

This AI agent is trained on Outreach's entire public content library, integrations docs, and product pages. Ask pricing logic, feature trade-offs, security posture, integrations, what happens at renewal — get answers in real time. No form, no waiting list.

outreach.ai · ai assistant Live
What it does

What Outreach actually is in 2026

Outreach calls itself the "AI Revenue Workflow Platform." The plain-English version: it runs your sales cadences (email, calls, LinkedIn, SMS), connects to your CRM, records and analyzes every sales call, and increasingly layers AI agents on top to research accounts, personalize outreach, prep meetings, and update deal data. It also reports on what's working across thousands of reps, which is most of why enterprise RevOps teams keep buying it.

The 2025 rebrand and restructure matter more than the AI features for most buyers. Outreach moved from outreach.io to outreach.ai in 2025 and collapsed its previous tier structure into three Amplify plans: Amplify Core (AI agents, integrated dialer, sequences, triggers, post-call Kaia, Smart Data Enrichment), Amplify Plus (adds real-time transcription, AI coaching, Deal Agent, deal health scoring, pipeline management), and Amplify Pro (adds Commit-style forecasting, scenario planning, AI projection, multi-currency). Each tier also includes a credit allotment: 25,000 for Core, 50,000 for Plus, 100,000 for Pro.

On February 25, 2026, Outreach shipped one of its biggest releases of the year. It added the Meeting Prep Agent (Beta) for automated meeting briefs, exposed Kaia APIs so external systems can query conversation intelligence, launched an Outreach MCP Server integrated with Microsoft Copilot Studio, added Sequential Dialing, and shipped Outreach Knowledge (Beta) for knowledge retrieval inside the platform. The MCP move is a defensible play against Microsoft and Salesforce platform encroachment.

What ships well versus what gets marketed: the sequence engine, Salesforce integration, Kaia transcription, and dialer are mature and reliable. The AI agents (Research, Personalization, Revenue, Deal, Meeting Prep) are real and shipping, but adoption data isn't public yet. Outreach claims customers see "up to 10x productivity" from the AI Prospecting Agent, which is vendor-reported. In practice, AI agents handle surface-level prospecting and prep well but stumble on the kind of deep deal-pattern questions a $130-per-user-month tool should be able to answer.

Ideal customer

Who Outreach is actually built for

Outreach is built for B2B sales organizations with at least 50 reps, and ideally 100 or more, running structured outbound on Salesforce CRM with a dedicated admin or RevOps team. The sweet spot is complex, multi-stakeholder enterprise sales motions where sequence sophistication, governance, and Salesforce-native activity logging genuinely matter. DocuSign runs 100+ MDRs on Outreach. Zoom, Okta, SAP, Snowflake, ZoomInfo, and Verizon are all on the platform.

It assumes you have admin capacity. Not a CRM administrator wearing five hats. A dedicated person who can own sequence templates, approval workflows, integration health, Kaia tuning, and AI agent configuration. Outreach is not a self-serve tool. Multiple G2 reviewers describe needing "a dedicated admin just to manage Outreach configurations." That cost is real and it shows up in headcount, not the contract.

The ideal buyer is a Salesforce-first enterprise at $50 million ARR or above, running structured outbound with a defined methodology, an enterprise security review that screens out lighter alternatives, and the budget to absorb $100K-$200K year-one spend. Below that threshold, the math gets harder. Mid-market teams with 10 to 30 reps consistently report that the per-seat cost, implementation overhead, and admin burden are disproportionate to what they actually use.

Conversely, if you're a HubSpot CRM shop, you should think very hard before signing. The integration problems are not edge cases; they are the single most consistent complaint in 2025-2026 reviews. If you're an AI-personalization-first team running signal-driven outbound, tools like Clay and Apollo are built more natively for that motion. If you're under 30 reps with no admin capacity, Apollo at $49-119 per user per month or Klenty at $60-119 will deliver most of the value with a fraction of the overhead. We've mapped the full shortlist in our guide to Outreach alternatives by use case.

At a glance

Strengths and weaknesses

+ Strengths
  • Most feature-dense sequence engine in the category with conditional logic, branching, and A/B testing
  • Salesforce integration depth that no competitor matches
  • Kaia conversation intelligence built into the platform, not a separate contract
  • AI agents (Research, Personalization, Deal, Meeting Prep) shipping and integrated across workflows
  • Enterprise security and governance: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, GDPR
  • 5,500+ customers including Zoom, SAP, Snowflake, DocuSign, ZoomInfo, Verizon
Weaknesses
  • Per-seat cost runs 2-3x Apollo and other AI-native alternatives
  • HubSpot integration is documented as broken across multiple specific failure modes
  • Customer support quality has declined post-layoffs, with CSM rotation and slow ticket resolution
  • Steep learning curve and admin-heavy workflows; new reps need 2-4 weeks to ramp
  • UI feels outdated next to AI-native upstarts like Clay and Apollo
  • Auto-renewal terms are rigid: 30-60 day cancellation windows and 8-12% renewal uplifts
Strengths, in depth

What Outreach genuinely does well

Outreach has earned its category leadership over a decade of building. These are the things buyers consistently rate it highest on across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius. They are also the things most newer competitors cannot replicate without years of catch-up.

01

The deepest sequence engine in the category

Conditional logic, branching cadences, out-of-office detection, advanced triggers, and built-in A/B testing. Reviewers consistently rank Outreach #1 on G2 for handling complex, multi-stakeholder workflows. If your outbound motion runs 8-step cadences with branching logic that adapts based on engagement, OOO replies, and CRM stage changes, Outreach handles it. Salesloft is close. Apollo, Klenty, and HubSpot are not.

This matters at scale. For a 100-rep enterprise team running 50 active sequences across multiple personas and stages, the difference between Outreach's branching and a lighter tool's static cadences shows up in pipeline. That capability alone justifies the price tag for organizations where it does.

02

Salesforce integration that no one else matches

Bidirectional sync, field-level mapping, activity logging, custom object support, and product-level alignment reinforced by Salesforce Ventures' 2021 investment. This is the single biggest reason Salesforce-shop enterprises pick Outreach over alternatives, and it's the most consistent positive theme in G2 reviews from Salesforce-native organizations.

Where it shows up most: every call, email, and sequence step writes back to Salesforce automatically with the right object association. Custom fields stay in sync. Activity history is complete. For Salesforce-first RevOps teams that have been burned by half-baked CRM integrations on other platforms, this is the table-stakes capability that's nearly impossible to find elsewhere.

03

Kaia conversation intelligence built into the same platform

Real-time transcription, live battlecards that surface during calls, red and green deal signals (silence after pricing, weak next steps, competitor mentions), and automatic CRM field updates from call content. As of February 2026, Outreach also exposes Kaia APIs so external systems can query conversation intelligence, opening up integration patterns that competitors don't allow.

Where it matters most: teams that would otherwise pay Gong $1,400-$3,000 per user per year for conversation intelligence get it included in the Outreach Plus or Pro tier. That's not a small bundle. For organizations comparing total stack cost, a single Outreach Plus contract often replaces a separate sequencing tool plus a separate Gong contract.

04

AI agents that actually ship

Research Agent builds real-time account briefs from public data and past interactions. Personalization Agent extends to LinkedIn messaging and call prep, not just email. Deal Agent updates sales methodology fields (economic buyer, decision criteria) from call data. Meeting Prep Agent (Beta, February 2026) compiles meeting briefs with attendee overviews. These are generally available, not vaporware, and the Feb 2026 release showed the cadence is real.

Outreach claims customers see "up to 10x productivity increase" from the AI Prospecting Agent. That's a vendor number, but the agent architecture is more mature than what Apollo, Salesloft, or HubSpot are currently shipping. Combined with MCP support and the Microsoft Copilot integration, this is the layer that keeps Outreach defensible against Microsoft and Salesforce platform encroachment.

05

Enterprise scale and security posture

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, GDPR controls audited as part of ISO 27701. Outreach handles 5,000+ rep deployments without breaking. DocuSign runs 100+ MDRs on the platform. SAP, Snowflake, Verizon, and McKesson are all customers.

If you're at the size where every other sales engagement vendor on your shortlist gets eliminated by your security review, Outreach is the one that consistently survives it. That's not glamorous, but it's a real differentiator for enterprise procurement. Combined with the Salesforce integration depth, this is what locks Outreach into Fortune 500 deals that smaller competitors can't reach.

Weaknesses, in depth

Where Outreach disappoints buyers

Every product has weaknesses. Outreach's are unusually concentrated in integrations, post-sale support, and a gap between marketing promises and shipped reality for buyers outside the Salesforce enterprise core. These are the things that show up most often in critical reviews, and the things buyers wish they'd pressure-tested before signing.

01

HubSpot integration is broken in documented, specific ways

This is the most common complaint in 2025-2026 reviews from non-Salesforce shops, and it's not subtle. Documented failure modes from HubSpot community forums include Call Outcome mapping that's greyed out, incremental syncs that fail after the initial sync (tag changes don't propagate), Opted Out fields that don't sync bidirectionally, and duplicate activities created on sync retry. One G2 reviewer line that surfaces across multiple aggregators: "The sync breaks every two weeks."

If your CRM is HubSpot, this is the buying decision that will define your next two years. The integration problems are not edge cases. They are the single most consistent complaint pattern in non-Salesforce reviews. HubSpot Sales Hub eliminates the integration layer entirely, which is exactly why we map it as the leading alternative for HubSpot CRM shops in our alternatives shortlist.

02

Customer support quality has declined post-layoffs

Four rounds of layoffs between 2023 and November 2024 hit go-to-market and support roles. The reviewer impact is visible: CSMs rotating three or more times in 4-12 months, support tickets taking days to weeks to resolve, knowledge base redirects instead of real help, and broken support portals. One anonymous G2 reviewer cited across multiple aggregators: "I escalated my concerns to multiple sales leaders, VP-level contacts, and customer success, and received no reply for days."

Proactive engagement from account managers surfaces primarily during renewal conversations. For a platform charging $100-$160 per user per month with $5K-$25K implementation fees, the support quality is meaningfully below what enterprise buyers expect. Push hard on support SLAs in writing during contract negotiation, not after.

03

Cost vs alternatives is a stretch for everyone but enterprise Salesforce

Reported per-seat pricing of $100-$160 per user per month, plus implementation fees of $5,000-$25,000, plus annual contracts only with no monthly option. A 50-rep team on Amplify Plus clears $100K year one before AI credit overages or professional services. Compare that to Apollo (data plus engagement) at $49-$119 per user per month with monthly billing, or Klenty at $60-$119, or HubSpot Sales Hub at $20-$150 with no separate platform contract.

One G2 small-business reviewer summed it up: "just an expensive email scheduler." That's harsh, but the underlying math is real. Teams that don't use Kaia, AI agents, or Commit forecasting are paying enterprise prices for sequence engine features that lighter tools deliver at 30-50% of the cost. The price-to-value math works for 50+ rep Salesforce shops and breaks for almost everyone else.

04

Complexity and admin overhead is a hidden line item

TrustRadius reviewer: "We needed a dedicated admin just to manage Outreach configurations." G2: "The interface is not intuitive, there are so many features that new hires get lost." New SDRs typically take 2-4 weeks to become productive on the platform. Full team onboarding runs 4-8 weeks. Sequence approval workflows require admin sign-off, which creates delays for reps who want to launch a new cadence quickly.

This is a real, ongoing cost that doesn't show up in the contract. Many buyers don't internalize it until six months post-implementation, when the dedicated admin time is competing with strategic RevOps work and the platform's flexibility starts to feel like a tax instead of a feature.

05

Auto-renewal terms are rigid and lock-in is real

Annual contracts only. No monthly billing option. 30-60 day cancellation notice required, with auto-renewal as the default. Renewal uplifts run 8-12% in Q1 2026 unless capped in the original contract. One G2 reviewer: "They auto-renew each year, and if you miss the cancellation window by just hours, you're billed for another full term."

Combined with the implementation cost ($5K-$25K) and the admin learning curve, switching costs compound the longer you stay. Negotiate the cancellation window (push for 90 days), cap renewal uplifts at 5-7%, and get data export rights in writing before signing. Buyers who don't do this find out at renewal that the leverage has shifted entirely to the vendor.

Pricing

What Outreach actually costs in 2026

Outreach does not publish pricing for any Amplify tier. Based on procurement data, G2 and Capterra reports, and aggregated 2026 review analysis, here's what's actually being quoted.

Amplify Core runs around $100 per user per month (range $90-$140 depending on team size and term length). Amplify Plus runs around $130 per user per month (range $110-$165). Amplify Pro runs around $160 per user per month (range $140-$175). Each tier includes an AI credit allotment: 25,000 for Core, 50,000 for Plus, 100,000 for Pro. Overage rates aren't disclosed publicly but are negotiable in the contract.

On top of per-seat costs, expect implementation fees of $5,000-$25,000 depending on CRM complexity and customization. Annual contracts are standard, with no monthly option. Multi-year deals (2-3 years) unlock 10-30% discounts but increase lock-in. Renewal uplifts run 8-12% unless capped in the original contract. The official pricing page says "no platform fees," but procurement reports cite $2,000-$5,000 per year as a separate line item on some legacy or managed-services deals. Push back hard on any platform fee line item.

Real-world example: A 50-rep team on Amplify Plus pays roughly $78,000 in per-seat costs at list, dropping to $60-65K negotiated. Add a $15,000 implementation fee and the year-one total is $75K-$80K negotiated, $93K at list. A 100-rep team on Amplify Pro easily clears $150K-$200K year one. For negotiation tactics, contract clauses to push back on, and a tier-by-tier breakdown, see our full Outreach pricing guide.

Real customers

What buyers actually say

Verbatim quotes from G2, Capterra, Reddit, and TrustRadius. Verified May 2026.

It's the best tool for SDRs and AEs at all types of levels to do prospecting at scale.

Scott B., Head of Sales (Banking) — Capterra, Feb 2026

The platform streamlines sales engagement through automation while remaining easy to use.

Kevin H., Senior SDR (Computer Software) — Capterra, Aug 2025

It is in my opinion the best tool in the market, it integrates with our CRM.

Randy P., Account Manager (Computer Software) — Capterra, Jul 2025

I escalated my concerns to multiple sales leaders, VP-level contacts, and customer success, and received no reply for days.

Anonymous G2 reviewer — cited by MarketBetter 2026 analysis

We needed a dedicated admin just to manage Outreach configurations.

Anonymous TrustRadius reviewer — cited by MarketBetter 2026

Set up and learning curve, Salesloft is a lot easier to use for just dialling.

Anonymous Account Executive (Computer Software) — Capterra, Dec 2025

They auto-renew each year, and if you miss the cancellation window by just hours, you're billed for another full term.

Anonymous G2 reviewer — cited by Salesforge 2026 review analysis

The sync breaks every two weeks.

Anonymous G2 reviewer (HubSpot integration complaint) — cited across multiple 2026 review aggregators

How it compares

How Outreach compares to its closest competitors

These are the three tools Outreach is most often evaluated against in 2026. Each one wins in a different scenario.

OutreachvsSalesloft

Both are enterprise sales engagement platforms with similar pricing ($100-$175 vs $75-$165 per user per month). Salesloft scores higher on G2 (4.5 vs 4.3 across 3,400-3,900+ reviews), wins on ease of use (8.8 vs 8.3), and wins on ease of setup (8.5 vs 7.5). Salesloft also acquired Drift in February 2024 and completed a merger with Clari in late 2025, positioning itself as a broader "revenue platform" rather than just engagement. Outreach edges Salesloft on sequence complexity, forecasting depth, and Salesforce integration polish. Salesloft wins on UX, onboarding speed, support quality, and the bundled Clari forecasting story. For most non-Salesforce shops, Salesloft is the lower-friction enterprise pick. See Salesloft alternatives.

OutreachvsApollo.io

Apollo is data plus engagement (275M+ contacts, 60M+ companies) with built-in sequencing and a dialer for $49-$119 per user per month with transparent pricing and monthly billing. Outreach is engagement-only. You bring data via ZoomInfo, LeadIQ, or SalesIntel integrations at higher cost. For teams under 50 reps that need all-in-one prospecting, Apollo is a fraction of the cost and 80% of the engagement value. For enterprise teams that already own data infrastructure and need sequence sophistication, Outreach is the deeper tool. The honest cutoff: under 30 reps, Apollo. Over 100 reps with Salesforce, Outreach. 30-100 reps, the answer depends on whether you have admin capacity. See Apollo alternatives.

OutreachvsHubSpot Sales Hub

HubSpot Sales Hub is CRM-native, which eliminates the integration layer that's the single most documented Outreach complaint. Published pricing ranges from $20 to $150 per user per month with a free CRM tier and monthly billing. HubSpot lacks Outreach's sequence depth, AI agent breadth, and conversation intelligence built-in. For HubSpot CRM users running mid-complexity outbound, HubSpot Sales Hub with Breeze AI is increasingly viable and avoids the Outreach-HubSpot sync nightmare entirely. For HubSpot shops with complex sequencing requirements, the Outreach+HubSpot combo is a documented headache that buyers should test with a paid pilot before committing. See HubSpot Sales Hub alternatives.

Bottom line

Final verdict

Outreach is the Salesforce enterprise default, with documented friction

Outreach is the safest sales engagement pick for Salesforce-first enterprise teams. The sequence engine is the deepest in the category, Kaia conversation intelligence is built in, the AI agents are real and shipping, and the security posture survives Fortune 500 procurement reviews. For its core ICP, the product justifies the price and the competitive moat is real.

Buy Outreach if you're a 50+ rep Salesforce shop with $50M+ ARR, a dedicated admin or RevOps function, structured outbound that needs branching cadences and sequence approval governance, and budget for $100K-$200K year-one spend. The Salesforce integration alone is worth the premium for this profile.

Skip Outreach if you're on HubSpot CRM, you're under 30 reps with no admin capacity, you're running AI-personalization-first signal-driven outbound, or you just need sequencing and a dialer. Start with our shortlist of Outreach alternatives. Apollo or HubSpot Sales Hub will deliver 80% of the value at 30-50% of the cost with no Salesforce integration tax.

If you're buying Outreach, negotiate hard. Push for 20-25% off list on multi-year deals, cap renewal uplift at 5-7% (the default 8-12% is one of the easier asks), lock implementation cost at signature (not estimated), bake in generous AI credits, and push the cancellation window from 30-60 days to 90 days. Our Outreach pricing breakdown details the contract clauses worth pushing back on. Buyers who negotiate extract real value. Buyers who accept the bundle pay full freight for the rest of their contract.

Final verdict: 3.7 out of 5. Category-leading product for Salesforce enterprise. A documented friction point for almost everyone else.

FAQ

Common questions about Outreach

Outreach does not publish pricing. Reported per-seat costs in 2026 are roughly $100 per user per month for Amplify Core, $130 for Amplify Plus, and $160 for Amplify Pro. Add implementation fees of $5,000-$25,000, annual contracts only, and 8-12% renewal uplifts unless capped. A 50-rep team on Amplify Plus clears $75K-$100K year one negotiated.
For Salesforce-first enterprise teams with 50+ reps, $50M+ ARR, and a dedicated admin function, yes. The sequence engine, Salesforce integration, and Kaia conversation intelligence justify the spend. For teams under 30 reps, no. Apollo at $49-$119 per user per month or HubSpot Sales Hub at $20-$150 will deliver most of the value at a fraction of the cost.
Amplify Core includes AI agents (Research, Revenue, Personalization), Smart Data Enrichment, the integrated dialer, sequences, triggers, and post-call Kaia conversation intelligence. Plus adds Meeting Prep Agent (Beta), Deal Agent, real-time transcription, AI coaching, deal health scoring, and pipeline management. Pro adds Commit-style forecasting, scenario planning, AI projection, forecast trends, and multi-currency support. Each tier includes a credit allotment (25K, 50K, 100K).
Outreach rebranded its primary domain from outreach.io to outreach.ai in 2025, alongside its repositioning as an "AI Revenue Workflow Platform" unveiled at Unleash 2025 in June. The rebrand reflects the platform's push toward agentic AI as the foundation rather than a feature. Both domains still resolve, but outreach.ai is now the canonical marketing site.
Specific documented failure modes from HubSpot community forums and G2 reviews include Call Outcome mapping that's greyed out, incremental syncs failing after the initial sync (tag changes don't propagate), Opted Out fields that don't sync bidirectionally, and duplicate activities created on sync retry. This is the single most consistent complaint pattern in non-Salesforce Outreach reviews. HubSpot CRM users should test the integration thoroughly with a paid pilot before committing, or evaluate HubSpot Sales Hub as a CRM-native alternative.
Kaia is Outreach's conversation intelligence module. It provides call recording, real-time transcription, AI coaching via content cards, buyer sentiment analysis, automatic action item capture, and live battlecards during calls. As of February 2026, Outreach also exposes Kaia APIs so external systems can query conversation intelligence. Basic post-call Kaia is included in Amplify Core. Advanced real-time features and AI coaching require Amplify Plus or higher.
Yes. Outreach had four documented rounds of layoffs between February 2023 and November 2024, totaling roughly 30%+ of the workforce. The most recent cut (November 2024) hit 9% of staff, mostly go-to-market roles. Manny Medina stepped down as CEO in September 2024 and became Executive Chairman, then founded a new startup called Paid in 2025. Abhijit Mitra (previously President of Product & Technology, with prior leadership roles at Oracle, SAP, ServiceNow, and Commure) became CEO on September 12, 2024.
The February 25, 2026 product release was one of Outreach's biggest of the year. It added the Meeting Prep Agent (Beta) for automated meeting briefs, exposed Kaia APIs for external integration, launched the Outreach MCP Server with Microsoft Copilot Studio integration, added Sequential Dialing, and shipped Outreach Knowledge (Beta) for knowledge retrieval inside the platform. The MCP move positions Outreach within Anthropic's Model Context Protocol ecosystem and is a defensible play against Microsoft and Salesforce platform encroachment.
Realistic timeline is 4-8 weeks for full team onboarding. Technical implementation takes 2-4 weeks (CRM integration, sequence migration, user provisioning). New SDRs need another 2-4 weeks to become productive on the platform. Sequence approval workflows require admin sign-off, which adds friction post-launch. Anyone promising 2-week production rollout is either oversimplifying or skipping change management.
Outreach contracts are annual only with auto-renewal as the default. Cancellation requires 30-60 days notice in writing before the renewal date. Renewal uplifts run 8-12% unless capped in the original contract. One G2 reviewer noted: "if you miss the cancellation window by just hours, you're billed for another full term." Negotiate a 90-day cancellation window, cap renewal uplifts at 5-7%, and get data export rights in writing before signing, not after.